Black Americans face education, income barriers to healthy behaviors, study finds: Policy action is needed to address income, education gap for low-income individuals, researchers say
Better educational opportunities and higher incomes may be key to closing the gap of cardiovascular health behaviors — including smoking, physical activity, and diet quality — between black and white Americans, according to a new study led by a University of Iowa researcher.
The study, headed by Kara Whitaker, assistant professor in the UI’s Department of Health and Human Physiology, examined 30 years of data on cardiovascular health behaviors, which established that black Americans have lower health behavior scores than whites.
The researchers examined a host of reasons and determined that socioeconomic factors — notably income and educational level — influenced the differences in health behaviors between the groups more than other variables, such as an individual’s emotional state or the neighborhood in which one lives.
“The gap in education and income are the critical causes,” says Whitaker, corresponding author on the study, published in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine. “We are arguing here that our societal structure makes it more challenging for black Americans to have the same level of socioeconomic status as whites. This study highlights the profound impact of socioeconomic factors, which are mostly beyond an individual’s control, on health behaviors.”
She recommends policy makers address the challenges facing lower-income Americans of all races to close the health gap.
“Making the same educational opportunities available to low-income individuals, regardless of race, would be a great starting point,” Whitaker says. “A lot of people born into poverty have less opportunity to go to college, for example. That’s one area that could be addressed.”
The researchers analyzed data from 3,081 black and white Americans who enrolled in a 30-year (1985 to 2016) study by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute called Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA). The data were classified in three areas to try to explain the difference in cardiovascular health behaviors between the groups:
Socioeconomic factors, including income, education, net worth, employment status, difficulty paying for basics, home ownership, and health insurance. Psychosocial factors, including depression, racial discrimination, stress lasting six months or more, mental and physical quality of life, and hostility.
Neighborhood factors, including neighborhood poverty, racial or ethnic segregation, neighborhood cohesion and neighborhood resources
The study was unique in that it incorporated multiple factors that could affect racial differences in health behaviors. Also, the researchers examined health behaviors, such as diet, smoking, and physical activity, together rather than separately as many previous studies have done.
Data showed socioeconomic factors caused the greatest difference in cardiovascular health behaviors, with neighborhoods less of an influence and psychosocial conditions the least. Moreover, the authors found differences in health behaviors between the groups appear as early as age 18.
“The race disparity in health behaviors starts very early on,” Whitaker says. “This is attributable to factors such as education level, which may not be under an individual’s control.”
Contributing authors to the study, “Racial disparities in cardiovascular health behaviors: The Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults Study,” include David Jacobs, Jr. and Ryan Demmer from the University of Minnesota; Kiarri Kershaw and Donald Lloyd-Jones from Northwestern University; John Booth III, April Carson, and Cora Lewis from the University of Alabama at Birmingham; David Goff, Jr. from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Penny Gordon-Larsen from the University of North Carolina; and Catarina Kiefe from the University of Massachusetts Medical School in Worcester, Massachusetts.
The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, a branch of the National Institutes of Health, and the Intramural Research Program at the National Institute on Aging funded the research.
Source: Read Full Article
